Cabuyao robbery debunks gun ban rationale
The idiot who wrote this is probably one of those who think that turning a modern city into the wild west is the solution to crime and violence. Of course if he spent more time studying logic instead of dreaming of gunfights he'd have been able to make a better argument. He says
Had there been a legally armed citizen carrying a weapon that was concealed, it might not have been so easy for the robbers to commit the murders.
without considering that banks require everyone who comes in to deposit firearms with the guard. Allowing customers to come inside with concealed weapons is suicide for any bank, even in his wild west fantasy land.
He then parrots the pro-gun line:
I think we all agree that criminals shouldn’t have guns. But what’s the advantage of disarming the good people?
But he missed a crucial point: someone is lobbying FOR a gun ban. People ARE allowed to own and carry guns today and what good did that do?